https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server/ Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:28:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2 https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server/#comment-30 Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:28:40 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server.aspx#comment-30 Oracle *might* have 3400% more vulnerabilities than MS SQL, but it has 5000% more features than MS SQL. Seriously after working on both databases I know which one I prefer..Transact SQL is by far the most painful language to use (errmmm maybe javascript comes close)….

]]> https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server/#comment-29 Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:47:26 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server.aspx#comment-29 Yeah, I appreciate that… but there’s some research that suggests that SQL Server isn’t too bad – which is good for the SQL world.

]]> https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server/#comment-28 Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:23:04 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2006/11/22/oracle-has-3400-more-vulnerabilities-than-sql-server.aspx#comment-28 give a man 7 watches and he’ll give you seven versions of the time. Check out secunia, factor in bug severity and the fact the article is talking “reported bugs”. Theres a lot more to it than a single ‘report’ … time to exploit, time to patch, occurrent frequency, severity, vendor openness and responsiveness … anyone can look good or bad depending on the moment in time the report snapshot chooses to use …

]]>