<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Evaluation forms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Glover		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms/#comment-35</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Glover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/robfarley/archive/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms.aspx#comment-35</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The slight issue I have with the SMS voting is the cost of the SMS is borne by the voter.

Fine for the odd vote but I wonder how people would feel if it became the norm?

Lol, yes the form collection process for the roadshow did feel a little hardcore but getting feedback continues to be a problem...

Cheers, Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slight issue I have with the SMS voting is the cost of the SMS is borne by the voter.</p>
<p>Fine for the odd vote but I wonder how people would feel if it became the norm?</p>
<p>Lol, yes the form collection process for the roadshow did feel a little hardcore but getting feedback continues to be a problem&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers, Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Gardiner		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms/#comment-34</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Gardiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/robfarley/archive/2006/11/30/evaluation-forms.aspx#comment-34</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The great thing about paper forms is that you can fill them out right there at the event.

I bet this year&#039;s TechEd had the lowest response rate of filling out eval forms because you had to find a computer and do it online. 

A nice idea as it saves someone doing the data entry, but by the time most people get around to finding a computer, they&#039;ve probably forgotten half of the presentation anyway.

If everyone had tablet pc&#039;s then maybe you could do evals online and get a good response rate, but I think paper has a lot going for it still.

The other trick is to pick sessions that no one goes to to increase your chance of winning the $100 gift voucher. The downside of that is you probably go to a session that even you aren&#039;t interested in!

-dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about paper forms is that you can fill them out right there at the event.</p>
<p>I bet this year&#8217;s TechEd had the lowest response rate of filling out eval forms because you had to find a computer and do it online. </p>
<p>A nice idea as it saves someone doing the data entry, but by the time most people get around to finding a computer, they&#8217;ve probably forgotten half of the presentation anyway.</p>
<p>If everyone had tablet pc&#8217;s then maybe you could do evals online and get a good response rate, but I think paper has a lot going for it still.</p>
<p>The other trick is to pick sessions that no one goes to to increase your chance of winning the $100 gift voucher. The downside of that is you probably go to a session that even you aren&#8217;t interested in!</p>
<p>-dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
