Comments on: T-SQL Tuesday – T-SQL Puzzle with HAVING https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having/ Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:54:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: robfarley https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having/#comment-720 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:54:47 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having.aspx#comment-720 Michael,

I think Kalen’s is unexpected, but that mine just needs a good understanding of how HAVING works.

Make sure you read my explanation for it at http://msmvps.com/blogs/robfarley/archive/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-having-puzzle-answer.aspx

Rob

]]> By: Michael J Swart https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having/#comment-719 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:30:42 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having.aspx#comment-719 … that was unexpected. And strangely enough this is related to Kalen Delaney’s T-SQL Tuesday entry here:

http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kalen_delaney/archive/2010/01/11/non-aggregated-columns-in-a-group-by-query.aspx

]]> By: Michael https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having/#comment-718 Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:49:44 +0000 /blogs/robfarley/archive/2010/01/12/t-sql-tuesday-t-sql-puzzle-with-having.aspx#comment-718 SELECT 1 + 1 will return 2, I have to assume that a column title ‘no column name’ will contain a single value ‘No rows’… but I dont think it will return anything as the where condition is never going to be satisfied.

]]>