<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Does the paradigm fit the environment?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2015/12/08/does-the-paradigm-fit-the-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2015/12/08/does-the-paradigm-fit-the-environment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Farley		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2015/12/08/does-the-paradigm-fit-the-environment/#comment-2707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Farley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lobsterpot.com.au/?p=3532#comment-2707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indeed. &#034;Good enough plan found&#034; :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. &quot;Good enough plan found&quot; 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Low		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2015/12/08/does-the-paradigm-fit-the-environment/#comment-2706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Low]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lobsterpot.com.au/?p=3532#comment-2706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post Rob. I liked the comment about wincing a little. I&#039;m sure we all do that regularly.
I&#039;ve always thought though that the first sign of a mature consultant is when they don&#039;t want to throw out or rewrite everything the minute they walk in the door. 
Many developers are used to tear down and rewrite as a modus operandi but most databases are never like that. The databases just need to be morphed over a period of time to a place that&#039;s closer to where you&#039;d hope it would be in the end. It&#039;s all about deciding on appropriate compromises, none of which are how you actually wish it was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Rob. I liked the comment about wincing a little. I&#8217;m sure we all do that regularly.<br />
I&#8217;ve always thought though that the first sign of a mature consultant is when they don&#8217;t want to throw out or rewrite everything the minute they walk in the door.<br />
Many developers are used to tear down and rewrite as a modus operandi but most databases are never like that. The databases just need to be morphed over a period of time to a place that&#8217;s closer to where you&#8217;d hope it would be in the end. It&#8217;s all about deciding on appropriate compromises, none of which are how you actually wish it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
