<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Coding standards or values?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2022/06/14/coding-standards-or-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2022/06/14/coding-standards-or-values/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Farley		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2022/06/14/coding-standards-or-values/#comment-4734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Farley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lobsterpot.com.au/?p=5575#comment-4734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2022/06/14/coding-standards-or-values/#comment-4733&quot;&gt;Gerard Jaryczewski&lt;/a&gt;.

Dzięki. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dzięki. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerard Jaryczewski		</title>
		<link>https://lobsterpot.com.au/blog/2022/06/14/coding-standards-or-values/#comment-4733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerard Jaryczewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lobsterpot.com.au/?p=5575#comment-4733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post. Values are part of someone&#039;s philosophy of programming. Maybe because we are talking about our philosophy rarely or never, it&#039;s easier to talk about standards, not values? Standards are already some level of abstraction, all right, but values are a level or two higher. Even if everybody is able to make an abstraction, an effective, useful, higher-level abstraction is hard to define and understand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Values are part of someone&#8217;s philosophy of programming. Maybe because we are talking about our philosophy rarely or never, it&#8217;s easier to talk about standards, not values? Standards are already some level of abstraction, all right, but values are a level or two higher. Even if everybody is able to make an abstraction, an effective, useful, higher-level abstraction is hard to define and understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
